Dodgers’ Dave Roberts Backs MLB Salary Cap and Floor

The conversation around spending in Major League Baseball just got a little more interesting, thanks to Los Angeles Dodgers manager Dave Roberts. In a candid appearance on Amazon Prime’s “Good Sports,” Roberts signaled that he’d be open to a salary cap in MLB—so long as it comes with a meaningful spending floor.

Coming from the skipper of the sport’s most expensive roster, his comments shed light on the growing tensions over payrolls. There’s a lot brewing about competitive balance and what the next collective bargaining agreement might look like.

Dave Roberts Backs a Salary Cap – With a Big Catch

On the surface, a high-payroll manager supporting a salary cap sounds like a contradiction. But Roberts didn’t call for MLB to slam the brakes on spending without conditions.

Instead, he wants a system that doesn’t just curb the top but also pushes the bottom upward. He sees another major American league doing just that.

Pointing to the NBA’s Revenue-Sharing Blueprint

Roberts pointed to the NBA’s structure as a model that MLB could learn from. The NBA combines a salary cap with robust revenue sharing, creating a framework in which large-market and small-market teams both have guardrails on spending.

In his view, any MLB salary cap must be paired with a spending floor. He’s not just talking about limiting how much the Dodgers or Yankees can spend; he wants low-budget clubs to invest more in their on-field product instead of running on shoestring payrolls.

The implication? Competitive balance isn’t just a “top” problem, it’s a “bottom” problem too.

The Dodgers: Baseball’s Ultimate Big Spender

Roberts’ comments carry extra weight because of the financial juggernaut he manages. No team embodies baseball’s spending power quite like the Dodgers right now.

Los Angeles hasn’t just nudged the edge of MLB’s financial system—it’s blown right past it.

A Record-Setting Payroll and Historic Contracts

Last season, Roberts guided a roster that set a new financial standard. The Dodgers posted a $415 million competitive balance tax figure, the highest in MLB history.

That’s not just a big number—it’s a new frontier for what a club is willing to spend in pursuit of championships. The previous offseason showcased their financial muscle even more.

The Dodgers committed over $1.4 billion in player salaries, headlined by two staggering deals:

Pair those with an already star-studded roster, and it’s not surprising that the Dodgers’ luxury tax bill after the 2024 season reached $103 million. That’s another MLB record—and honestly, it’ll probably fall again after 2025.

Is Dodgers’ Spending Bad for Baseball?

With numbers like these, it’s no wonder critics point to the Dodgers as Exhibit A in the argument that MLB’s economic system is broken. Yet Roberts isn’t buying the idea that big spending alone is damaging the sport.

He even turned the narrative on its head with some pointed humor.

“Really Ruin Baseball” by Winning It All

Roberts half-joked that the only way the Dodgers might “really ruin baseball” is by winning back-to-back World Series titles. No club has pulled that off since the late-1990s Yankees dynasty.

The subtext? Dominance has always been part of baseball’s story. From the Yankees of old to modern super-teams, big-spending powers have been both villains and attractions, drawing ratings, rivalries, and revenue.

Roberts also made it clear that even if a cap did limit player payroll, it wouldn’t slow the Dodgers’ broader ambitions.

He stressed that a cap wouldn’t touch the club’s ability to invest heavily in:

In other words, Los Angeles intends to remain an industry leader, with or without a cap.

The Bigger Picture: Labor Tension on the Horizon

Roberts’ remarks don’t exist in a vacuum. They drop into an environment where owners and players are already bracing for a contentious round of collective bargaining.

League-wide, the Dodgers have become the face of MLB’s payroll inflation. They’re also a convenient symbol in a much bigger fight.

Salary Cap vs. Spending Floor: The Coming Battle

For years, the players’ union has pushed back hard on anything close to a hard salary cap. They point to soaring franchise values and growing revenues as proof that there’s no real need to limit player earnings.

Owners, on the other hand, want more cost certainty. They’re always looking for ways to shrink the gap between small and large markets.

Roberts’ twist—he says he’d only support a cap if it forces low-revenue clubs to spend more—gets right to the heart of that split. A real spending floor would stop teams from pocketing revenue sharing cash while putting out bare-minimum rosters.

With MLB creeping toward its next round of labor talks, the Dodgers’ balance sheet and Roberts’ words will probably come up a lot. They don’t just show how one big-market club does business—they put the sport’s biggest question front and center:

Can baseball actually build a system that reins in payroll extremes on both sides, but keeps star power, fair play, and labor peace intact?

 
Here is the source article for this story: Dodgers’ Dave Roberts says he supports MLB salary cap, floor in TV appearance