The San Francisco Giants are tiptoeing into this offseason. The front office keeps insisting there’s a plan, but honestly, the early moves haven’t shifted the club’s competitive trajectory in any meaningful way.
They’ve made some modest pitching additions. There’s significant money tied up in managerial costs, and several high-impact stars are still out there.
The Giants sit at a crossroads, caught between a cautious retool and a genuine push for contention.
Giants’ Offseason Strategy: Conservative, Cautious, and Pitching-Focused
The organization keeps talking about a renewed focus on pitching. Their early moves back that up.
But for a club that finished in the middle of the pack and needs real impact talent, this offseason just looks like tinkering. It’s not exactly transformative.
Adrian Houser Headlines a Quiet Pitching Class
The biggest addition so far is Adrian Houser, signed for two years and $22 million with a club option. Houser fits the mold of a classic back-end starter: he’s durable, he eats innings, but he’s not the kind of arm who changes a rotation or tips a division race.
From the front office’s perspective, Houser is a stabilizer, not a star. He gives the Giants another credible arm for starts, but he doesn’t really change the calculus against the Dodgers, Padres, or even some up-and-coming National League clubs.
Low-Cost Lottery Tickets in the Bullpen
Alongside Houser, the Giants grabbed low-risk fliers on rehabbing relievers Jason Foley and Sam Hentges. These are the kinds of moves analytically inclined clubs love—low-cost, maybe high-reward arms who, if healthy, can deepen a bullpen without blowing up the budget.
Still, value-driven bullpen plays are just complementary. They don’t really move the needle, and they don’t address the need for a frontline starter or a big bat in the middle of the order.
Top-Tier Pitching Still on the Board
What makes the Giants’ conservative approach stand out is the caliber of starting pitching still available. The market hasn’t cleared out its headliners yet, and San Francisco, at least on paper, has both the need and the financial capacity to make a splash.
Potential Aces Who Could Transform the Rotation
Several top arms are still out there, including:
Any of these pitchers would give a serious boost to the front of the Giants’ rotation. Yet chairman Greg Johnson and GM Zack Minasian have downplayed the likelihood of committing big money long-term, signaling they’re reluctant to wade into the deep end of the market.
Offensive Help: Big Bats That Actually Fit
On the position-player side, the Giants have clear needs: more impact in the outfield and better production in the infield, especially at second base. This isn’t a club that can just run back the same offense and hope for different results.
Kyle Tucker, Cody Bellinger, and Bo Bichette as Ideal Targets
Several high-end hitters line up almost perfectly with the Giants’ positional gaps:
These players answer the Giants’ issues with power and defensive stability. Still, the front office seems hesitant to go all-in, especially at long-term, top-of-market prices.
Payroll, Managers, and the Illusion of Flexibility
On paper, the Giants project to a $176 million payroll, just a tick above last year’s Opening Day figure. That number seems to leave some breathing room under the luxury tax, but the details muddy the picture of financial flexibility.
Hidden Costs: Deferred Money and an Expensive Managerial Shuffle
The payroll estimate doesn’t include a $17 million deferred payment owed to Blake Snell. That’s a real cash outlay that never shows up in the competitive balance tax figure.
On top of that, the club is unusually leveraged in the dugout. Between paying fired manager Bob Melvin, buying out Tony Vitello’s college contract, and then paying Vitello’s new salary, the Giants are committing about $10.5 million to managers alone.
That’s a staggering number for non-players and basically siphons funds that might’ve gone to roster upgrades. So while there’s theoretical room under the tax line, a chunk of ownership’s budget is already spoken for.
Where the Giants Stand Now
Right now, here’s what the Giants have done:
If they keep playing it safe, the Giants might end up stuck in the middle again. Not bad enough to rebuild, not bold enough to really go after the National League’s top teams. The chance to change that story is still there, though. The real question: will ownership actually spend what it takes? Or will they just watch the window close?
Here is the source article for this story: The Giants Should Chase Upside On The Trade Market
Experience Baseball History in Person
Want to walk the same grounds where baseball legends made history? Find accommodations near iconic ballparks across America and create your own baseball pilgrimage.
Check availability at hotels near: Yankee Stadium, Fenway Park, Wrigley Field, Dodger Stadium
Plan your ballpark visit: Get MLB Ballpark Tickets and find accommodations nearby.
- Biographies
- Stadium Guides
- Current Baseball Players
- Current Players by Team
- Players that Retired in the 2020s
- Players that Retired in the 2010s
- Players that Retired in the 2000s
- Players that Retired in the 1990s
- Players that Retired in the 1980s
- Players that Retired in the 1970s
- Players that Retired in the 1960s
- Players that Retired in the 1950s
- Players that Retired in the 1940s
- Players that Retired in the 1930s