Marlins Win Arbitration Case Against Calvin Faucher

This article breaks down the Miami Marlins’ final salary arbitration win of the year. The panel awarded the club’s $1.8 million figure over reliever Calvin Faucher’s $2.05 million request.

It also puts Faucher’s season in some historical context. There’s a bit about how Super Two status factors into earnings, and how this year’s arbitration results fit into the broader MLB landscape.

Miami Marlins Win Final Salary Arbitration of the Year vs. Calvin Faucher

The three-member panel—Robert Herman, Paul Radvany, and Walt De Treaux—issued the decision after hearing both sides. Faucher, 30, finished last season with a 4-4 record and a 3.28 ERA in 65 relief appearances.

He converted 15 of 20 save opportunities. Over a career-high 60 1/3 innings, he struck out 59 and walked 24.

Faucher’s 2023 Season and Salary Overview

• 4-4 record with a 3.28 ERA over 65 relief appearances, including 15 of 20 saves.
• 59 strikeouts and 24 walks in 60 1/3 innings.
• Last season, Faucher earned $775,500 and qualified as Super Two eligible.
• Across parts of four major league seasons, he’s 9-11 with a 4.14 ERA and has 22 career saves.

Context of the Arbitration Decision in 2024

The ruling kept an 8-4 edge in favor of players in arbitration hearings this year. It’s part of a trend that’s shaped the process since 1974.

Faucher’s case stands out for the bullpen value he brought. Players with two to three years of service time often land higher pay through arbitration, and his situation fits right into that pattern.

Notable Outcomes and What They Signal for Players

Tarik Skubal just landed a record $32 million award in his hearing with Detroit. That kind of dominant performance in a qualifying season can really drive up numbers, even while teams try to hold the line on spending.

This year’s results highlight the constant tug-of-war between club budgets and what players can actually earn. Negotiations seem to lean more and more toward performance-based figures.

• Tarik Skubal secured a $32 million award in his arbitration case. That’s a benchmark for starting pitchers and shows what elite performance can do, even if you’ve only got a short window of service time.
• Arbitration outcomes have gone 362-278 in favor of teams since 1974. That stat really shows how things usually tilt toward owners, even though some recent cases have swung toward players.
• This year’s 8-4 edge for players stands out in the bigger picture. Sometimes just a few cases can shift how folks view value for relievers and those mid-tier starters.

The Marlins’ Faucher decision feels like a nod to the value of bullpen depth, but they’re still watching salary commitments closely. Players see these moments as a sign to leverage strong seasons and service time perks like Super Two, especially when the arbitration climate’s in their favor.

Honestly, the whole thing’s a balancing act—juggling the market value of relief arms with the cold reality of club payroll-concerns-ahead-of-offseason-decisions/”>payrolls. That tension will keep shaping how teams build their rosters for a while, no question.

 
Here is the source article for this story: Marlins win arbitration hearing vs. Faucher