The 2025 offseason gave us one of the more fascinating free-agent comparisons in recent memory. Kyle Schwarber and Pete Alonso, two elite power bats, landed nearly identical deals but brought very different value profiles to the table.
This breakdown digs into their contracts, production, underlying metrics, defensive value, and long-term projections. It’s not hard to see why front offices—and fans—are still split on which slugger they’d rather build around.
Schwarber vs. Alonso: The Contracts That Sparked the Debate
Both sluggers hit the market at the perfect time. They came off impact seasons and entered free agency as established middle-of-the-order anchors.
Their contracts say a lot about how the modern game values power, on-base skills, and positional flexibility.
Nearly Identical Deals, Very Different Player Profiles
Schwarber locked in a five-year, $150 million contract. Alonso got a five-year, $155 million pact.
On paper, they’re basically the same commitment: prime-years money for elite right-now production. But the underlying profiles? Totally different.
Schwarber is a bat-first designated hitter who spent almost all his time at DH, playing just 66 innings in the field. Alonso is a regular first baseman who sticks on the dirt and gives his team defensive stability along with his big-time pop.
Offensive Production: Schwarber’s Power Peak vs. Alonso’s All-Around Line
Look at the raw numbers from 2025, and Schwarber’s season leaps off the page. Alonso, though, offered a more balanced stat line that fits the classic middle-of-the-order mold.
Schwarber’s Monster 2025 at the Plate
In 2025, Schwarber put up the kind of year that gets you paid in free agency:
Those numbers, especially the 56 homers, put him squarely among the game’s most dangerous bats. The walk rate and on-base ability (.365 OBP) add to that power, making Schwarber more than just a boom-or-bust slugger.
Even as a near full-time DH, he produced close to 5-win value—a rare feat for a bat-only player.
Alonso’s Balanced Slugging and Doubles Power
Alonso’s 2025 was excellent, just more rounded and a little less explosive at the top:
The batting average and doubles really stand out. Alonso brought extra-base power across the board, not just home runs, and he did it while playing first base daily.
His offensive output didn’t quite match Schwarber’s in terms of sheer impact, but he still landed firmly in star territory.
Underlying Metrics: Why Schwarber’s Power Is Viewed as Rarer
Front offices care as much about how players produce as they do about the final line. The expected stats and quality-of-contact data nudge the scales toward Schwarber.
Quality of Contact and Sustainability Indicators
Over the past five years, Schwarber’s offensive metrics have been just a bit louder:
A .402 xwOBA is elite. Schwarber lives in that rare air where every swing feels like it might leave the yard.
Alonso’s .385 xwOBA and 46.7% hard-hit rate are great, just not quite as loud.
The 2025 season tossed in some BABIP noise. Alonso rode a career-high .305 BABIP, which probably padded his batting average and overall line.
Schwarber, on the other hand, posted a .253 BABIP, below his norms, suggesting his production might’ve actually been shortchanged by luck. That gap matters when teams try to project forward—Schwarber’s batted-ball profile just looks more sustainably dominant.
Defense, Age, and Roster Construction: Where Alonso Gains Ground
Schwarber might own the louder bat, but Alonso’s defensive role and age give him some important advantages as a long-term investment.
Positional Value and Younger Age Profile
Alonso plays first base every day, and that simple fact changes how a front office can build a roster. Having him at first:
Schwarber, as a full-time DH, doesn’t give you that flexibility. Teams have to commit a premium lineup spot solely to his bat and build around that constraint.
Age matters too. Alonso is two years younger than Schwarber, and for clubs signing five-year, nine-figure deals, that’s meaningful. His youth and playable defense make him the safer long-term bet to hold value into his mid-30s.
Why the Market Slightly Preferred Schwarber
Despite Alonso’s age and defensive edge, Schwarber drew more suitors and slightly more aggressive offers before landing his five-year, $150 million deal.
Rare Power vs. Safer Profile
Front offices these days chase ceiling, and Schwarber’s power potential is just harder to find. A left-handed bat that can hit 50+ homers with elite underlying metrics can flip a lineup—or a postseason series—almost by itself.
That kind of upside explains why his market was so hot. Alonso, meanwhile, is the definition of a high-floor slugger: strong but not transcendent underlying metrics, a more rounded skill set, and the defensive steadiness at first base that managers appreciate. Maybe he’s less likely to put up an MVP season, but he’s also less likely to fall off a cliff if his bat cools.
Which Slugger Would You Choose?
Ask five executives, and you might get five different answers.
The choice usually comes down to team context.
Fans and analysts can’t really agree, which honestly makes this whole debate a lot more interesting.
In a league obsessed with power and efficiency, Schwarber and Alonso offer two distinct paths to get there—one built on rare, crushing impact, the other on steady, well-rounded production with a glove in the mix.
Here is the source article for this story: Poll: Would You Rather Have Kyle Schwarber Or Pete Alonso?
Experience Baseball History in Person
Want to walk the same grounds where baseball legends made history? Find accommodations near iconic ballparks across America and create your own baseball pilgrimage.
Check availability at hotels near: Yankee Stadium, Fenway Park, Wrigley Field, Dodger Stadium
Plan your ballpark visit: Get MLB Ballpark Tickets and find accommodations nearby.
- Biographies
- Stadium Guides
- Current Baseball Players
- Current Players by Team
- Players that Retired in the 2020s
- Players that Retired in the 2010s
- Players that Retired in the 2000s
- Players that Retired in the 1990s
- Players that Retired in the 1980s
- Players that Retired in the 1970s
- Players that Retired in the 1960s
- Players that Retired in the 1950s
- Players that Retired in the 1940s
- Players that Retired in the 1930s